PRs that appear ready to merge: CI is green, at least one approval, and all review threads resolved. A maintainer can likely merge these with minimal effort.
Each PR has three scores on a 0–10 scale:
| Points | Signal |
|---|---|
| 3.0 | No merge conflicts |
| 2.5 | CI passing 1 |
| 2.5 | Has approval 1 |
| 2.5 | Feedback addressed 1 |
| 2.5 | Discussion healthy 1 |
| 2.0–3.0 | Small, easy to review (2.0) / trivial ≤2 files, ≤20 lines (3.0) 1 |
| 1.5 | Has maintainer review 1 |
| 1.0 | Recently active 1 |
| 0.5–1.0 | Team or known author (1.0) / community (0.5) 1 |
| 0.7 | Recently updated 1 |
| 0.5 | Well labeled 1 |
| 0.3 | Good review momentum 1 |
| Points | Signal |
|---|---|
| 1.5 | No approval yet |
| 1.5 | CI blocking merge (otherwise merge-ready) |
| 1.0 | Community author |
| 1.0 | Reviewed, not approved |
| 1.0 | Has unresolved feedback |
| 1.0 | High interest |
| 0.5 | Large change (>200 lines) |
| 0.5 | Trivial change (≤2 files, ≤20 lines, no unresolved threads) |
| 0.5 | Old but active (>30d) |
| −1.5 | Author silent >14d (ball in their court) |
| −0.5 | Author slow 7–14d (ball in their court) |
(ready + 1) × (need + 1)
normalized to 0–10
PRs that are both high-need and near-ready rank highest.
🎯 = action ≥ 5
⚡ = action 4–5
1 Weight from 980-PR statistical analysis. Click any column header to re-sort. Click [?] on any score to see the breakdown.
| Ready | Need | Action | PR | Title | Next Action | CI | Disc | Age | Upd | Size | Author | Area |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 1.7 | 2.2 | #14288 | Fix issue 11956: [Dark Mode] CheckBox in TreeView/ListView is not in dark mode after enabled SystemColorMode.Dark | 🟢 @LeafShi1🔍 or other maintainer: Ready to merge |
✅ 8/0/0 | 0/5t 4ppl | 42d | 12d | 130 | @SimonZhao888🔍 |
DarkMode |
| 9.9 | 1.1 | 1.9 | #14179 | Update the link of the "APIs of DotNet" in porting-guidelines.md | 🟢 @KlausLoeffelmann🔍 or other maintainer: Ready to merge |
✅ 2/0/0 | 0/0t 0ppl | 80d | 7d | 4 | @LeafShi1🔍 |
Infrastructure |
| 9.7 | 0.6 | 1.4 | #14260 | Fix issue 14259: Deserialization of the CodeTypeReference to generic type is incorrect | 🟢 @LeafShi1🔍 or other maintainer: Ready to merge |
✅ 9/0/0 | 0/0t 2ppl | 50d | 1d | 26 | @aerworker🔍 |
DesignerSupport |